Land Development in New Zealand – Case Studies on the Importance of Site Selection, due DIligence, Finance and the Regulatory En

Author/s: John McDonagh

Date Published: 1/01/2010

Published in: Volume 16 - 2010 Issue 1 (pages 70 - 96)

Abstract

This research investigated critical factors that contribute to the success of residential land development in New Zealand. The methodology involved determining those factors identified as critical by international researchers and then drawing comparisons to critical factors identified in interviews with various members of four property development teams active in New Zealand. This paper focuses on factors associated with the site itself. The findings presented here include the concept of “success” in New Zealand is centered on profitability, timeframes and budgets. There was a greater focus on the due diligence phase, at the expense of the site selection phase, compared with earlier research. There were also fewer options available for financing property development in the New Zealand context. The development legislation was generally seen as appropriate, but its application was felt to be inconsistent and the source of much of the risk in a property development. While the critical factors identified were similar to those found in the literature, there was a much greater reliance on experience to manage their impact than on the more formal approaches employed in other countries.

Download Full Article

Download the Full Article PDF

14445921.2010.11104296.pdf 14445921.2010.11104296.pdf (176kB)

Keywords

Development - Development Finance - Due Diligence - Regulatory Environment - Residential - Resource Management - Site Selection - Subdivision - Success Factors

References

  • Arrow International Ltd, Arrow International: Project Development. (No date). Development Planning Guide, Christchurch, pp. 2–30
  • Bank of America. (2002). Mezzanine Finance: Closing The Gap Between Debt And Equity. Capital Eyes, October, pp. 1–4.
  • Christiansen, W. K. S. (Ed). (1996) Fundamentals of Property Management. (2 Ed). Wellington: Butterworths.
  • Crosby, A. (1994), Implications for Property from Trends in Resource Management, New Zealand Valuers Journal, June, pp. 48–49.
  • Dowell, D. E. (1989). Making Land Development Work: The Process and Critical Elements for Success. Real Estate Finance, Fall, pp. 15–26.
  • Gitman, L.J., Juchau, R., Pearson, K., & Clemens, M. (1995). Principles of Managerial Finance in Australia. New York: Harper Collins Inc.
  • Guerard, R. (2005). Land Acquisition and Development Finance Part 4. Professional Builder, November, pp. 33–37.
  • Heimlich, R.E., & Anderson, W.D. (2001). Development at the urban fringe and beyond: Impacts on argriculture and rural land. Agricultural Economic Report, no. 803. U.S.D.A, pp. 1–8.
  • Jarchow, S. P. (1991), Graaskamp on Real Estate, Washington: Urban Land Institute.
  • Loh, P. K. (2003). Mezzanine Finance: The resurgence of an old investment tool. Technopreneurial.com. Electronic Journal [on line]. Retrieved on 24 July, 2006, from http://www.technopreneurial.com
  • Martin, W. B. (1984), How to Predict Urban Growth Paths, The Appraisal Journal, April, pp 424–429.
  • Pearson, T.D. (1991), Location! Location! Location! What is Location?, The Appraisal Journal, January, pp. 7–20.
  • Peiser, R.B. & Schwanke, D. (1992) Professional Real Estate Development. Washington: Dearbon Financial Publishing Inc. and the Urban Land Institute.
  • Rae, B. (1999), Healer Heal Thyself? A Strategic Approach To RMA Issues, The Property Business, Issue no. 3, pp. 50.
  • Rowland, P.J. (1993). Property investments and their financing. Sydney: The Law Book Company Limited.
  • Sorenson, R C. (1990). Project Management: Success or Failure? The Appraisal Journal, April, pp. 147–152.
  • Waterhouse, M. D. (1991). Principles of the Real Estate Development Process. Economic Development Review, Fall, pp. 25–28.