Developing Guidelines for Riverfront Developments for Malaysia

Author/s: Azlina Binti Md. Yassin, Sandy Bond, John McDonagh

Date Published: 1/01/2011

Published in: Volume 17 - 2011 Issue 4 (pages 511 - 530)

Abstract

Rivers and water are important resources for human life, the environment and national development. In Malaysia, the importance of rivers as the focal point of cities was established from the early times of civilisation and will remain so. Population growth, economic growth, urbanisation and increased technology have transformed many Malaysian river systems from water industries into non water industries. Due to these changes, the functions of riverfront areas have also changed and the current pattern of riverfront development in Malaysia now focuses more on mixed-use development and recreation. To date, numbers of riverfront development projects are being developed in Malaysia for recreation, residential and mixed-use. Unfortunately, in most cases, the developments identified are not successful, having cost effects more than their economic value. Example are increases in water pollution indexes and rates of juvenile problems. The focus of this study was to identify the attributes of riverfront development, in order to develop guidelines for riverfront development for Malaysia. The findings of this study were based on interviews conducted with Government officers, Property developers, and the Waterfront community from three case study areas (qualitative phase), and from questionnaires mailed and e-mailed to property development companies listed under Bursa Malaysia (quantitative phase). The findings identified 18 attributes to be used in assisting developers when undertaking riverfront projects in the future. The attributes identified were then recommended to be used as guidelines of best practices of riverfront development in Malaysia.

Download Full Article

Download the Full Article PDF

14445921.2011.11104340.pdf 14445921.2011.11104340.pdf (368kB)

Keywords

Riverfront Development - Riverfront Development Guidelines - Waterfront - Waterfront Development

References

  • Abidin, R. Z. R. Z. (2004). Water resources management in Malaysia: The way forward. Paper presented at the Asia Water 2004 (30 March - 02 April 2004).
  • Andaya, B. W., & Andaya, L. Y. (2001). A history of Malaysia (Second ed.). Hampshire, Britain: Palsgrave.
  • Bertsch, H. (2008). The key elements to successful waterfront design. Real Estate Weekly, 54.39.
  • Bicknell, K. B., & Gan, C. (1997). The value of waterway enhancement in Christchurch: A preliminary analysis (Department of Economics and Marketing discussion paper). Canterbury, New Zealand: Department of Economics and Marketing.
  • Breen, A., & Rigby, D. (1996). The new waterfront: A worldwide urban success story. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Breen, A., & Rigby, D. (Eds.). (1994). Waterfronts: Cities reclaim their edge. United State: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
  • Bruttomesso, R. (2006). Waterfront development: A strategic choice for cities on water. Paper presented at the Waterfront Development Forum: China Maritime (02 March 2006), Hong Kong.
  • Bursa Malaysia. (2009). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Bursa Malaysia.
  • Butuner, B. (2006). Waterfront Revitalisation as a Challengeing Urban Issue. Paper presented at the 42nd ISoCaRP Congress.
  • Choguill, C. L. (1996). Towards sustainability of human settlements. Habitat International, 20(3), v-viii.
  • Cohen, J. W. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2 ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Concise Oxford English Dictionary (Ed.). (2009). (11 ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Costanza, R. (1999). The ecological, economic, and social importance of the oceans. Ecological Economics, 31, 199–213.
  • Creswell, J. W., Clark, V. L. P., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advanced mixed-methods research designs. In A. Tashakorri & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 209–240). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Dong, L. (2004). Waterfront developmenA case study of Dalian, China. Unpublished master thesis, University of Waterloo, Canada.
  • Gaffen, Y. G. (2004). Cities riding waves of success with well planned waterfront restoration. Public Management, 86(10).
  • Hair, J. F., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis (6th ed.): Prentice Hall.
  • Hoyle, B. (2002). Urban waterfront revitalisation in developing countries: The example of Zanzibar’s Stone Town. The Geographical Book, 168(2), 141–162.
  • Hussein, H. (2006). Urban recreational riverfronts: Successful revitalisation elements. Book of Design and the Built Environment, 2(1).
  • Kitchin, R., & Tate, N. J. (2000). Conducting research in human geography: Theory, methodology and practice. Harlow: Prentice Hall.
  • Latip, N. S. A., Heath, T., Shamsuddin, S., Liew, M. S., & Vallyutham, K. (2010). The contextual integration and sustainable development of Kuala Lumpur’s city centre waterfront: An evaluation of the policies, law and guidelines. Paper presented at the The World, Engineering, Science and Technology Congress (ESTCON 2010) (15–17 June 2010), Kuala Lumpur Convention Centre, Malaysia.
  • Logan, J. R. (2001). The New Ethnic Enclaves in America’s Suburbs. Albany, New York: Lewis Mumford Center.
  • Malaysian Department of Drainage and Irrigation. (2009). Manual and guidelines for water management. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Ministry of Natural Resource and Environment.
  • Malaysian Department of Environment. (2007). Environmental Quality Report, 2007. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Department of Environment, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment.
  • Mann, R. (Ed.). (1973). Rivers in the city. Newton Abbot: David & Charles.
  • Meyer, W. B., & B.L.Turner. (1991). Changes in land use and land cover: A global perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Morse, J. M. (2003). Principles of mixed-method and multi-method research design. In A. Tashakorri & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed method in social and behavioral research (pp. 189–207). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publication, Inc.
  • Murray, G. (2003). A Room with a Water View. Beijing Review, 46(19), 26.
  • Newman, I., & McNeil, K. (1998). Conducting survey research in the social sciences. Lanham, Maryland: University Press of America.
  • Ryckbost, P. (2005). Redeveloping urban waterfront property. USA: University of Michigan.
  • Sapsford, R., & Jupp, V. (2006). Data collection and analysis. London: SAGE Publications.
  • Sekaran, U. (2003). Research methods for business: A skill building approach (4th edition ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Sweet, S. A., & Grace-Martin, K. (2008). Data analysis with SPSS: A first course in applied statistics (3 ed.). USA: Pearson Education, Inc.
  • Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Mixed methods in social and behavioral research. California: SAGE Publications Incorporated.
  • Tong, S. T. Y., & Chen, W. (2002). Modeling the relationship between land use and surface water quality. Book of Environmental Management, 66, 377–393.
  • Torre, L. A. (1989). Waterfront development. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
  • Tunbridge, J., & Ashworth, G. (1992). Leisure resource development in cityport revitalisation: The tourist-historic dimension. In B. Hoyle & D. Pinder (Eds.), European port cities in transition (pp. 177–199). London: Belhaven Press.
  • Wagner, W. E. (2010). Using SPSS for social statistics and research methods (2 ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Pine Forge Press.
  • Watson, J. S. (1986). Ross’s landinA river edge park opportunity. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Making Cities Liable.
  • Weng, C. N. (2002). Sustainable management of rivers in Malaysia: Involving all stakeholders. Paper presented at the Regional Symposium on Environment and Natural Resources (10–11 April 2002).
  • Weng, C. N. (2005). Sustainable management of rivers in Malaysia - Involving all stakeholders. International Book River Basin Management, 3(3), 147–162.
  • Weng, C. N. (2009). Issue and challenges in water governance in Malaysia. Environmental Health Science Engineering, 6(3), 143–152.
  • Weng, C. N., Ibrahim, A. L., & Hajar, A. R. (2002). The role of Non-Governmental Organisations in water resources management in Malaysia. Paper presented at the Regional Symposium on Environment and Natural Resources (10–11 April 2002), Hotel Renaissance Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  • Wrenn, D. M. (1983). Urban waterfront development. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Land Institute.
  • Yassin, A. M., Eves, C., & McDonagh, J. (2010a). An evolution of waterfront development in Malaysia. Paper presented at the 16 Pacific Rim Real Estate Society Conference (24–27 January 2010), Intercontinental Hotel, Wellington, New Zealand.
  • Yassin, A. M., Eves, C., & McDonagh, J. (2010b). Waterfront development in Malaysia: Do we have sustainable governance?. Paper presented at the PhD. Colloqium Program for 16 Pacific Rim Real Estate Society Conference (24–27 January 2010) Intercontinental Hotel, Wellington, New Zealand.
  • Yunus, A. J. M., Nakagoshi, N., & Ibrahim, A. L. (2003). Application of GIS and Remote Sensing for measuring and evaluating land-use change and its impact on water quality in the Penang River Watershed. Ecol. Civil Eng., 6(1), 97–110.
  • Zhang, L. (2002). An evaluation an urban riverfront park, Riverfront Park, Spokane, Washington- Experience and lessons for designer. Unpublished master thesis, Washington State University, United States.