The Volatility Spillovers in Asian Listed Property Companies in Developed and Emerging Markets

Author/s: Thi Kim Nguyen

Date Published: 1/01/2012

Published in: Volume 18 - 2012 Issue 1 (pages 49 - 65)

Abstract

This paper uses exponential-generalised autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (EGARCH) model to examine empirically the volatility spillovers of listed property companies in 13 Asian country markets. The capitalisation-weighted index for 3 tiers of developed markets (Japan, Hong Kong, Singapore), emerging markets (Thailand, Taiwan, Malaysia, Korea) and lesser emerging markets (China, India, Indonesia, Philippines, Sri Lanka, Vietnam) were analysed. The results showed that property companies returns in individual countries have no excessive return compared to the stock index, are more aggressive than the respective local equity indices whilst lagged property companies returns provided little explanatory power in the current property returns. At the tier level, tier 1 determined its stable role in the region with significant spillovers to the other two tiers, and the heteroskedasticity in the tier series whilst tier 3 showed the significant, yet unstable role in the region. The tier 2 countries saw no spillover from the local stocks, yet received some impact from the US market. Tier 3 countries show reducing spillover factors from high spillover (China) to moderate (India and Indonesia) and low spillover (Vietnam, Philippines, and Sri Lanka), which reflects the low integration of these countries to the global market.

Download Full Article

Download the Full Article PDF

14445921.2012.11104350.pdf 14445921.2012.11104350.pdf (430kB)

Keywords

Asia - Developed Markets - Emerging Markets - Lesser Emerging Markets - Listed Property Companies - Volatility Spillover

References

  • Chatrath, A, Liang, Y and Mclntosh, W 2000, ‘The asymmetric REIT-beta puzzle’, Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, 6(2), 101-111.
  • CIA 2010, The World Fact Book, Asian countries.
  • Cotter, J andStevenson, S 2006, ‘Multivariate modeling of daily REIT volatility’, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 32(3), 305-325.
  • Dickey, DA and Fuller, WA 1981, ‘Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with unit root’, Econometrica, 49, 1057-1072.
  • EPRA 2010, Global Real Estate Universe, EPRA News, 33/2010, EPRA.
  • Garvey, R, Santry, G and Stevenson, S 2001, ‘The linkages between real estate securities in the Asia Pacific’, Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, 7, 240-258.
  • Hoesli, M and Serrano, C 2007, ‘Securitized real estate and its link with financial assets and real estate: an international analysis’, Journal of Real Estate Literature, 15(1), 59-84.
  • Li, DD and Yung, K 2007, ‘REIT returns: between the Pacific and the Atlantic’, Review of Accounting and Finance, 6(4), 353-369.
  • Liow, KH 1997, ‘The historical performance of Singapore property stocks’, Journal of Property Finance, 8(2), 111-125.
  • Liow, KH 2008, ‘Financial crisis and Asian real estate securities market interdependence: some additional evidence’, Journal of Property Research, 25, 127-155.
  • Liow, KH, Ooi, J and Gong, Y 2005, ‘Cross-market dynamics in property stock market - some international evidence’, Journal of Property Investment and Finance, 23(1), 55-75.
  • Liow, KH, Ho, KHD, Ibrahim, MF and Chen, Z 2008, ‘Correlation and volatility dynamics in international real estate securities markets’, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 39, 202-223.
  • Macquarie Securities 2010, Global Property Pulse: January 2010, Macquarie Securities.
  • Mei, J and Hu, J 2000, ‘Conditional risk premiums of Asian real estate stocks’, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 21, 297-313.
  • Michayluk, D, Wilson, PJ and Zurbruegg, R 2006, ‘Asymmetric volatility, correlation and returns dynamics between the U.S. and U.K. securities real estate markets’, Real Estate Economics, 34(1), 109-131.
  • Milunovich, G and Thorp, S 2006, ‘Valuing volatility spillovers’, Global Finance Journal, 17, 1-22.
  • Newell, G and Chau, KW 1996, ‘Linkages between direct and indirect property performance in Hong Kong’, Journal of Property Finance, 7, 9-29.
  • Nguyen, TK 2011a, ‘The significance and performance of listed property companies in Asian developed and emerging markets’, Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, 17(1), 24-47.
  • Nguyen, TK 2011b, ‘The significance and performance of listed property companies in the Philippines’, Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, 17(2), 260-286.
  • Philips, PCB and Perron, P 1988, ‘Testing for a unit root in time series regression’, Biometrika, 75, 335-346.
  • Sing, TF and Sng, SBS 2003, ‘Conditional variance tests of integration between direct and indirect real estate markets’, Journal of Property Investment and Finance, 21(4), 366-382.
  • Stevenson, S 2002, ‘An examination of volatility spillovers in REIT returns’, Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, 8(3), 229-238.
  • Wilson, P and Zurbruegg, R 2004, ‘Contagion or interdependence? Evidence from comovements in Asia-Pacific securities real estate markets during the 1997 crisis’, Journal of Property Investment and Finance, 22(5), 401-413.
  • Wilson, P, Stevenson, S and Zurbruegg, R 2007, ‘Measuring spillover effects across Asian property stocks’, Journal of Property Research, 24, 123-128.
  • Worldbank:www.worldbank.org: various information.
  • World Federation of Exchanges 2011, 2010 Annual Report and Statistics, WFE.