The Linkage Between Competitive and Operational Advantage and Entrepreneurship within Australian Real Estate Franchises

Author/s: Linda Chartres

Date Published: 1/01/2014

Published in: Volume 20 - 2014 Issue 2 (pages 171 - 185)

Abstract

Out of 37,000 enterprises operating within the Australian real estate industry, well over 50% of those are franchised outlets suggesting franchising popularity. The study collectively extends the franchising literature through semi-structured interviews with six leading real estate stakeholders, specifically focussing on three distinct yet interdependent areas of interest. Bound together in a contractual agreement, the franchisor and the franchisee form a strategic alliance which benefits both parties and enables each to be entrepreneurial. The study highlights the relevance of ownership potential as a key motivational force behind entrepreneurs choosing to franchise and stresses the importance of development of culture as a key consideration in brand strength for franchisors and nurturing good managerial talent to provide strong leadership for franchisees. For the franchise to be successful, the research points to linkage between competitive advantage and efficiency arising out of correct implementation of business systems, training systems, recruitment of good operators and adoption of innovative strategies. The use of technology and specifically internet has revolutionised the real estate industry however, in acknowledging this, the study concludes that its scope of use and correct application are the keys to reaping greatest benefits. There is evidence to suggest that divergence in formation of franchise models to adopt a less formal approach to franchising is on the rise in some areas of Australian states. It is envisaged that this research will enhance an understanding of the rationale behind the insurgence of hybrid franchise models and thus bear great significance to the industry.

Download Full Article

Download the Full Article PDF

14445921.2014.11104394.pdf 14445921.2014.11104394.pdf (237kB)

Keywords

Competitive Advantage - Efficiency - Motivation - Operational Advantage - Real Estate Franchising

References

  • Anderson, RI, Fok, R, Zumpano, LV and Elder, HW 1998, ‘The efficiency of franchising in the residential real estate brokerage market’, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 15, Issue 4, pp. 386-396.
  • Australian Bureau of Statistics 2004, http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/ProductsbyTopic/0CDB76C250A6DB61CA2568A900139366? OpenDocument(Accessed 13th October 2012).
  • Benjamin JD, Chinloy P, Jud GD and Winkler DT 2005, ‘Technology and real estate brokerage firm financial performance’, Journal of Real Estate Research, Vol. 27, Issue 4.
  • Business Review Weekly 2012, What real estate agents won’t tell you, http://www.brw.com.au/p/what_real_estate_agents_won_tell_1nmVF9VongR94hyHXda3VP(Accessed 16 April 2013)
  • Castrogiovanni, GJ, Combs, JG and Justis, RT 2006, ‘Resource scarcity and agency theory predictions concerning the continued use of franchising in multi-outlet networks’, Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 44, Issue 1, pp. 27-44.
  • Caves, R and Murphy, W 1976, ‘Franchising: Firms, markets and intangible assets’, Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 42, pp. 572-586.
  • Combs, J, Michael, S and Castrogiaovanni, GJ 2004, ‘Franchising: A review and avenues to greater theoretical diversity, Journal of Management, Vol. 30, Issue 6, pp. 907-931.
  • Combs, JG and Castrogiovanni, GJ 1994, ‘Franchisor strategy: A proposed model and empirical test of franchise versus company ownership’ , Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 32, Issue 2, pp. 37-48.
  • Cradduck L 2012, Place and space: Community in the internet economy what this will mean for property, 18th Annual Pacific-Rim Real Estate Society Conference, 15-18 January 2012, Adelaide, Australia.
  • Creswell, JW, Hanson, WE, Plano-Clark, VL and Morales, A 2007, ‘Qualitative research designs: selection and implementation’, The Counselling Psychologist, Vol. 35, pp. 236.
  • Dant, RP 1995, ‘Motivations for franchising: Rhetoric versus reality’, International Small Business Journal, Vol. 14, Issue 1, pp. 10-32.
  • Demisi, SV 2004, ‘Internet versus traditional office sales’, Property Management, Vol. 22, Issue 2, pp.155-165.
  • Flint-Hartle, S 2005, Towards understanding real estate franchises in Australasia, Pacific Rim Real Estate Conference, January 23-28th 2005, Melbourne, Australia
  • Flint-Hartle, S 2007, Franchising in the real estate agency sector: Multiple perspectives and converging angles of inquiry, Massey University, Auckland.
  • Flint-Hartle, S and De Bruin, A 2008, The entrepreneurial alliance: Franchising in real estate agency, Massey University, Auckland.
  • Flint-Hartle, S and De Bruin, A 2010, ‘Franchising success: Insights from real estate brokerage’, International Small Business Journal, Vol. 29, Issue 1, pp. 58-77.
  • Franchise Council of Australia 2012, http://www.franchise.org.au/what-is-franchising-.html (Accessed 17th August 2012).
  • Gonzalez-Diaz, M and Solis-Rodriguez, V 2011, ‘Why do entrepreneurs use franchising as a financial tool? An agency explanation’ , Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 27, pp. 325-341.
  • Guba, E and Lincoln, Y 1989, Fourth generation evaluation, Newbury Park, California.
  • Hamilton J 2007, Delivering service value networks: Smart business, 36th Western Decision Sciences Institute Meeting, April 4-7, 2007, Denver.
  • Hamilton J and Selen W 2003, ‘Development of a strategic positioning matrix for the internet-enabled real estate industry: an Australian perspective’, The E-Business Review, Vol. 3,Issue 1, pp. 57-61.
  • IBISWorld 2012, http://www.ibisworld.com.au/industrv/default.aspx?indid=539(Accessed 1 July 2013).
  • Justis, RT and Judd, R 1989, Franchising, South-Western Publishing Company, Cincinnati, Ohio.
  • Kaplan, B and Maxwell, JA 2005, ‘Qualitative research methods for evaluating computer information systems’, in Kaplan, B and Maxwell, JA (Eds), Evaluating the organisational impact of healthcare information systems, Health Informatics, Part 1, Chapter 2, pp. 30-55.
  • Lee, BS 1999, An investigation of factors affecting the quality of the relationship between the franchisee and franchisor and its impact on franchisee’s performance, satisfaction, and commitment: A study of the restaurant franchise system, State University, Blacksburg, Virginia.
  • Lewis, D and Anderson, R 1999, ‘Residential real estate brokerage efficiency and the implications of franchising: A Bayesian approach’, Real Estate Economics, Vol. 27, Issue 3, pp. 543-560.
  • Muhanna WA 2000, ‘E-commerce in the real estate brokerage industry’, Journal of Real Estate Practice and Education, Vol. 3 Issue 1, pp. 1-16.
  • Oxenfeldt, A and Kelly, A 1969, ‘ Will franchise systems ultimately become wholly owned chains?’, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 44, pp. 69-83.
  • Parker, S 2012a, http://www.rebonline.com.au/features/technology/5385-cover-story-agents-of-change?highlight=WyJhZ2VudHMiLCJvZiIsImNoYW5nZSIsImFnZW50cyBvZiIsImFnZW50cyBvZiBjaGFuZ 2UiLCJvZiBjaGFuZ2UiXQ== (Accessed 14 August 2012).
  • Parker S 2012b, http://www.rebonline.com.au/features/19-surveys/5278-cover-story-making-the-switch?highlight=WyJtYWtpbmciLCJ0aGUiLCJzd2l0Y2giLCJtYWtpbmcgdGhlIiwibWFraW5nIHRoZSBzd2l 0Y2giLCJ0aGUgc3dpdGNoIl0=(Accessed 13 July 2012).
  • Porter, M 2001, ‘Strategy and the internet’, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 79, Issue 3, pp. 63-78.
  • Rubin, PH 1978, ‘The theory of the firm and the structure of the franchise contract’, The Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 21, pp. 221-231.
  • Shane, S 1996a, ‘Explaining variation in rates of entrepreneurship in the United States: 1899-1988’, Journal of Management, Vol. 22, Issue 5, pp. 747-781.
  • Shane, SA and Foo, M-D 1999, ‘New firm survival: Institutional explanations for new franchisor mortality’ , Management Science, Vol. 45, Issue 2, pp. 142-159.
  • Shane, SA and Hoy, F 1996, ‘Franchising: A gateway to cooperative entrepreneurship’, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 11, Issue 5, pp. 325-327.
  • Shane, SA and Venkataraman, S 2000, ‘The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 25, Issue 1, pp. 217-226.
  • Stanworth, J and Curran, J 1999, ‘Colas, burgers, shakes and shirkers: Towards a sociological model of franchising in the market economy’ , Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 14, pp. 323-344.
  • Stockdale, B 2012, http://www.rebonline.com.au/18-videos/general/5273-opinion-marketing-goes-wayback?highlight=WyJtYXJrZXRpbmciLCJnb2VzIiwid2F5IiwiYmFjayIsIm1hcmtldGluZ yBnb2VzIiwibWFya2V0aW5nIGdvZXMgd2F5IiwiZ29lcyB3YXkiLCJnb2VzIHdheSBiY WNrIiwid2F 5 IGJhY2siXQ==(Accessed 13th July 2012).
  • Tuccillo J A 1997, ‘ Technology and the housing markets’, Business Economics, Vol. 32, Issue 3, pp. 17-20.
  • Wright, O and McAuley, A 2011, ‘Australian franchising research: Review, synthesis and future research directions’, Australian Marketing Journal, Vol. 20, Issue 2, pp. 158-163.
  • Yin, RK 2003, Case study research: Design and methods, Thousand Oaks, California.