Impact of entrepreneurship education programme (EEP) on entrepreneurial intention of real estate graduates

Author/s: Hasniyati Hamzah, Zahiriah Yahya, Abdul Ghani Sarip, Yasmin Mohd Adnan

Date Published: 2/01/2016

Published in: Volume 22 - 2016 Issue 1 (pages 17 - 29)

Abstract

In the current socio-economic context of the “risk society” characterised by uncertainty and turmoil, entrepreneurship is one of the soft skills that is important among university graduates to ensure their survival in the real world. Realising that this skill can be taught and honed in professional undergraduate programmes, many universities have made entrepreneurship education a compulsory subject to improve undergraduate’s entrepreneurship skills. The discourse on entrepreneurship education programme (EEP) revealed a number of issues being discussed within conventional professional programmes such as engineering and management. Little is known about the impact of EEP on entrepreneurship intention within less popular professional programmes such as real estate. This paper provides an insight into how the compulsory entrepreneurship course impacts the entrepreneurial intentions of graduates of a real estate programme in a public university in Malaysia. Using a mixed method approach, a questionnaire survey and interview were undertaken to elicit respondents’ views about the success of the course in terms of instilling and shaping characteristics associated with entrepreneurship. Respondents were found to be less impressed with theory, and more influenced by real-life examples and experiences when emulating entrepreneurship behaviour.

Download Full Article

Download the Full Article PDF

14445921.2016.1158897.pdf 14445921.2016.1158897.pdf (851kB)

Keywords

Entrepreneurship Education - Graduates - Malaysia - Real Estate

References

  • Ajzen, I. (2011) The theory of planned behaviour: Reactions and reflections, Psychology & Health. 26, –.p:1113-1127. Psychology & Health.
  • Armitage, C. J.Conner, M. (2001) Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review, British Journal of Social Psychology. 40, p:471-499. British Journal of Social Psychology.
  • Fayolle, A.Gailly, B.Lassas-Clerc, N. (2006) Assessing the impact of entrepreneurship education programmes: a new methodology, Journal of European Industrial Training. 30(9), p:701-720. Journal of European Industrial Training.
  • Hamilton, R. T.Harper, D. A. (1994) The entrepreneur in theory and practice, Journal of Economic Studies. 21, p:3-18. Journal of Economic Studies.
  • Hisrich, R. D.Peters, M. P. (1998) Entrepreneurship. McGraw-Hill. Entrepreneurship.
  • Ibrahim, A. B.Soufani, K. (2002) Entrepreneurship education and training in Canada: a critical assessment, Education + Training. 44(8/9), p:421-430. Education + Training.
  • Kao, J. J. (1991) The entrepreneurial organization. New Jersey, NJ:Prentice Hall. The entrepreneurial organization.
  • Kautonen, T.van Gelderen, M.Tornikoski, E. T. (2013) Predicting entrepreneurial behaviour: A test of the theory of planned behaviour, Applied Economics. 45, p:697-707. Applied Economics.
  • Kuratko, D. F.Hodgetts, R. M. (2007) Entrepreneurship: Theory, process, practice. Mason, OH: South-Western College. Entrepreneurship: Theory, process, practice.
  • Majumdar, SVaradarajan, D. (2013) Students’ attitude towards entrepreneurship: Does gender matter in the UAE?, Foresight. 15(4), p:278-293. Foresight.
  • Ministry of Higher Education. (2007) Asas Pembudayaan Keusahawanan. Sintok: (‘)UUM. Asas Pembudayaan Keusahawanan.
  • Oosterbeek, H.van Praag, M.Ijsselstein, A. (2010) The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurship skills and motivation, European Economic Review. 54, p:442-454. European Economic Review.
  • QAA. (2012) Enterprise and entrepreneurship education: Guidance for UK higher education providers. Retrieved fromQuality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. Enterprise and entrepreneurship education: Guidance for UK higher education providers. Retrieved from http://www.qaa.ac.uk/en/Publications/Documents/enterprise-entrepreneurship-guidance.pdf
  • Scarborough, N. M.Zimmerer, T. W. (2005) Essentials of entrepreneurship and small business management. (4th economy ed.). Prentice Hall. Essentials of entrepreneurship and small business management.
  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1911) The theory of economic development. Cambridge MA:Harvard University Press. The theory of economic development.
  • Sheeran, P. (2002) Intention-behaviour relations: A conceptual and empirical review, European review of social psychology. Chichester: 12,. In (Eds.), (Vol. , pp. –)p:1-36. Wiley. European review of social psychology.
  • Souitaris, V.Zerbinati, S.Al-Laham, A. (2007) Do entrepreneurship programmes raise entrepreneurial intention of science and engineering students? The effect of learning, inspiration and resources, Journal of Business Venturing. 22, p:566-591. Journal of Business Venturing.
  • Thompson, E. R. (2009) Individual entrepreneurial intent: Construct clarification and development of an internationally reliable metric, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 33, –.p:669-694. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice.
  • Turker, D.Selcuk, S. S. (2009) Which factors affect entrepreneurial intention of university students?, Journal of European Industrial Training. 33, p:142-159. Journal of European Industrial Training.
  • von Graevenitz, G.Harhoff, D.Weber, R. (2010) The effects of entrepreneurship education, Journal of Economic Behaviour & Organisation. 76, p:90-112. Journal of Economic Behaviour & Organisation.
  • Wang, C. K.Wong, P. (2004) Entrepreneurial interest of university students in Singapore, Technovation. 24, p:163-172. Technovation.
  • Zhang, Y.Duysters, G.Cloodt, M. (2014) The role of entrepreneurship education as a predictor of university students’ entrepreneurial intention, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. 10, p:623-641. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal.