Balancing the scales of property rights: improving security of tenure for Queensland tenants – how and why

Author/s: Lucy Margaret Cradduck

Date Published: 2/09/2018

Published in: Volume 24 - 2018 Issue 3 (pages 285 - 302)

Abstract

Housing is a primary requirement of life and so home ownership remains the ideal for most people. However, not everyone is able to, or wants to, own their own home. These individuals depend upon rental accommodation as their form of home tenure with the number of individuals and families who live in rented accommodation steadily increasing. Ensuring that residential tenants have security of tenure for their home of choice is a right in many jurisdictions but not in Australia. Focusing on the Queensland position, the author examines the current lack of security of tenure experienced by private residential tenants in the context of the recently announced Queensland Government review, and in doing so they highlight matters requiring government attention. The article concludes by recommending changes to existing laws to improve security of tenure for tenants; as well as providing interim measures that may be adopted both long term and prior to finalisation of the current review.

Download Full Article

Download the Full Article PDF

14445921.2018.1553088.pdf 14445921.2018.1553088.pdf (1MB)

Keywords

Housing Tenure - Residential Tenancy - Security of Tenure

References

  • Adams v Scowcroft [2012] QCATA 25. (2012) (‘Adams v Scowcroft’). (15-February-2012).
  • Adkins, B.Guthrie, D.Mead, E.Summerville, J. (2002) Tenure security and its impact on private renters in Queensland’, (16-20-January-2002) Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute Queensland Research Centre.
  • Alikhan v Mian Prestige Real Estate trading as Ray White Runaway Bay [2010] QCATA 21. (2010) (‘Alikhan v Mian’). (1-June-2010).
  • Bamfield v Zanfan Pty Ltd [2010] QCAT 1. (2010) (‘Bamfield v Zanfan’). (22-February-2010).
  • Bauer v McMillan & Anor [2013] QCATA 140. (2013) (‘Bauer v McMillan’). (20-May-2013).
  • Bennett, M. (2016) Security of tenure for generation rent: Irish and Scottish approaches, Victoria University of Wellington Law Review. 47, –.p:363-384. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review.
  • Bradbrook, A. (1975) Poverty and the residential landlord-tenant relationship. Canberra:Australian Government Publishing Service. Poverty and the residential landlord-tenant relationship.
  • Briginshaw v Briginshaw [1938] HCA 34. (1938) 60 CLR 336 (‘Briginshaw’). (1938)
  • Canendo v Biddi Biddi Advancement Co-op Society Ltd [2012] QCATA 103. (2012) (‘Canendo v Biddi’). (28-May-2012).
  • Choice. (2017) Unsettled: Life in Australia’s private rental market, Report by Choice, National Shelter and NATO. (February-2017).
  • Cuda v Moriconi QCAT 083 [2014]. (2014) (‘Cuda v Moriconi’). (28-February-2014).
  • Cummings v Cairns and District Regional Housing Corporation Ltd [2013] QCATA 161. (2013) (‘Cummings v Cairns’). (31-May-2013).
  • de Brenni, M. (2018) The Palaszczuk government opening the doors to renting reform, Media Statement.Media Statement. Retrieved from http://statements.qld.gov.au/Statement/2018/9/30/the-palaszczuk-government-opening-the-doors-to-renting-reform
  • Du Preez v Linda’s Homes Pty Ltd [2010] QCATA 2. (2010) (‘Du Preez v Linda’s’). (22-March-2010).
  • Fitzpatrick, S.Pawson, H. (2014) Ending security of tenure for social renters: Transitioning to ‘ambulance service’ social housing?, Housing Studies. 29(5), p:597-615. Housing Studies.
  • Fitzpatrick, S.Watts, B. (2017) Competing visions: Security of tenure and the welfarisation of English social housing, Housing Studies. 32(8), p:1021-1038. Housing Studies.
  • Grimshaw v YMCA [2010] QCATA 88. (2010) (‘Grimshaw v YMCA’). (29-November-2010).
  • Hare v Nicoll. [1966] 2 WLR 441 ('Hare v Nicoll') Hare v Nicoll.
  • Hoolachan, J.McKee, K.Moore, T.Mihaela Soaita, A. (2017) ‘Generation rent’ and the ability to ‘settle down’: Economic and geographical variation in young people’s housing transitions, Journal of Youth Studies. 20(1), p:63-78. Journal of Youth Studies.
  • Housing Legislation (Building Better Futures) Amendment Act 2017. (Qld).Housing Legislation (Building Better Futures) Amendment Act 2017.
  • Hulse, K.Milligan, V. (2014) Secure occupancy: A new framework for analysing security in rental housing, Housing Studies. 29(5), p:638-656. Housing Studies.
  • Koothari, J. (2007) Report of the Special Rapporteur on Adequate Housing as a Component of the Right to an Adequate Standard of Living: Addendum – Mission to Australia. (11-May-2007). ,.31 July to 15 August 2006, UN Doc A/HRC?4?Add.2. Report of the Special Rapporteur on Adequate Housing as a Component of the Right to an Adequate Standard of Living: Addendum – Mission to Australia.
  • Levy, A. (2018) Apartment glut prompts massive discounting in Brisbane, research reveals, ABC News.ABC News. Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-05-16/apartment-glut-offers-massive-discounts-brisbane-properties/9764558
  • Lindenberg v Kalwun Development Corporation (No 2) [2011] QCAT 535. (2011) (‘Lindenberg v Kalwun (No 2)’). (27-October-2011).
  • Lindenberg v Kalwun Development Corporation [2011] QCAT 287. (2011) (‘Lindenberg v Kalwun’). (19-May-2011).
  • McLachlan v Real Tenants - Real Property Management CAN 130683297 [2011] QCAT 665. (2011) (‘McLachlan v Real’). (13-December-2011).
  • Morris, A. (2006) Living on the margins: The worlds of older private renters in Sydney, Australian Journal of Human Rights. , –.p:205-221. Australian Journal of Human Rights.
  • Morris, A. (2018) Housing tenure and the health of older Australians dependent on the age pension for their income, Housing Studies. 33(1), –.p:77-95. Housing Studies.
  • Property Agents and Motor Dealers Act 2000. (Qld) (superseded).Property Agents and Motor Dealers Act 2000.
  • Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009. (Qld). ('QCATA')Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009.
  • Queensland Government. (2017) Queensland housing strategy 2017-2017,.Retrieved from https://www.qld.gov.au/housing/public-community-housing/have-your-say-housing-strategy
  • Queensland Labor. (2017) ‘Putting Queenslanders first – state platform 2017?, 28-29 July, 2018,.Retrieved from https://www.queenslandlabor.org/media/20088/alp_state_platform_2017_02.pdf
  • Ray, D. (2018) Valuing data. New York:Taylor & Francis. Valuing data.
  • Residential Tenancies Act. (NT).Residential Tenancies Act.
  • Residential Tenancies Act 1987. (NSW).Residential Tenancies Act 1987.
  • Residential Tenancies Act 1987. (WA).Residential Tenancies Act 1987.
  • Residential Tenancies Act 1995. (SA).Residential Tenancies Act 1995.
  • Residential Tenancies Act 1997. (ACT).Residential Tenancies Act 1997.
  • Residential Tenancies Act 1997. (Tas).Residential Tenancies Act 1997.
  • Residential Tenancies Act 1997. (Vic) (‘RTAV’).Residential Tenancies Act 1997.
  • Residential Tenancies Amendment Act 2018. (Vic) (‘RTAAV’).Residential Tenancies Amendment Act 2018.
  • Residential Tenancies and Rooming Accommodation Act 2008. (Qld) (‘RTRAA’).Residential Tenancies and Rooming Accommodation Act 2008.
  • Residential Tenancies Rooming Accommodation Regulation 2009. (Qld).Residential Tenancies Rooming Accommodation Regulation 2009.
  • Retail Shop Leases Act 1994. (Qld).Retail Shop Leases Act 1994.
  • Spence v Davies and Ors [2011] QCATA 152. (2011) (‘Spence v Davies’). (14-June-2011).
  • Stewart, A. (1994) Rethinking housing law: A contribution to the debate on tenure, Housing Studies. 9(2), –.p:263-279. Housing Studies.
  • Tenants Union of Victoria. (2015) Online survey of Victorian private market renters: 2015,Retrieved from https://www.tuv.org.au/articles/files/housing_statistics/tenure-security-2015-survey-report.pdf
  • Victoria State Government (‘VSG’). (2015) Security of tenure – Issues Paper Residential Tenancies Act Review. (November-2015).Security of tenure – Issues Paper Residential Tenancies Act Review.
  • Webster v Smith [2012] QCATA 163. (2012) (‘Webster v Smith’). (27-August-2012).
  • Wharton, N.Cradduck, L. (2011) A comparison of security of tenure in Queensland and Western Europe, Monash University Law Review. 37(2), p:16-46. Monash University Law Review.
  • Wiesel, I.Pawson, H. (2015) Why do tenants leave social housing? Exploring residential and social mobility at the lowest rungs of Australia’s socioeconomic ladder, Australian Journal of Social Issues. 50(4), p:397-417. Australian Journal of Social Issues.
  • Wilks v Integrated Family and Youth Service Ltd [2015] QCAT 322. (2015) (‘Wilks v Integrated’). (19-August-2015).