Refining the Effects of Location in Computer-Assisted Rating Valuation

Author/s: Yu Shi Ming, Kevin Siu

Date Published: 1/01/2003

Published in: Volume 9 - 2003 Issue 3 (pages 224 - 247)

Abstract

In Hong Kong, the rating and valuation authority uses computer-assisted mass appraisal (CAMA) in the yearly reassessment of each property’s annual rental value. In particular, the multiple regression analysis (MRA) technique has been applied to the valuation of domestic, office, industrial and some commercial properties. Tax appraisers adopt the traditional method of geographical stratification to examine the effect of location on property values in the MRA models and encounter problems such as value inconsistency at neighbourhood boundaries. This paper introduces Location Value Response Surface (LVRS) modelling, which has been used to appraise single-family houses in the United States and Britain. The paper further develops a constant quality approach, based on the standardisation method, to derive the location factor and illustrates in a case study, how this technique can be used to value high-rise office units for rating purposes in Hong Kong. As a result, the prediction of property values is improved using the model.

Download Full Article

Download the Full Article PDF

14445921.2003.11104141.pdf 14445921.2003.11104141.pdf (417kB)

Keywords

Location - Location Value Response Surface Modeling - Mass Appraisal - Rating - Regression

References

  • Burrough, P. (1986), Principles of Geographical Information Systems for Land Resources Assessment, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
  • Commissioner of Rating and Valuation. (1999), Rating & Valuation Department, Hong Kong - Annual Summary 1998-99.
  • Commissioner of Rating & Valuation. (2000), Hong Kong Property Review 2000.
  • Commissioner of Rating & Valuation. (2000), Property Market Statistics 2 Quarter 2000.
  • Cook, C. (1988), Papers of the First World Congress on Assisted Valuation -Foreword. International Association of Assessing Officers & Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Chicago.
  • Cruden, G. (1986), Land Compensation and Valuation Law in Hong Kong, Singapore, Butterworths.
  • Des Rosiers, F. & Theriault, M. (1992), Integrating Geographic Information Systems to Hedonic Price Modelling: An Application to the Quebec Region. Property Tax Journal, Vol.11, No.1, pp. 29-58.
  • Eckert, J. (1990), Property Appraisal and Assessment Administration, Chicago, International Association of Assessing Officers.
  • Eichenbaum, J. (1989), Incorporating Location into Computer-assisted Valuation, Property Tax Journal, Vol.8, No.2, pp. 151-169.
  • Eichenbaum, J. (1995), The Location Variable in World Class Cities: Lessons from CAMA Valuation in New York City, Journal of Property Tax Assessment & Administration. Vol.1, No.3, pp. 46-60.
  • Gallimore, P., Fletcher, M. & Carter, M. (1996), Modelling the Influence of Location on Value, Journal of Property Valuation & Investment, Vol.14, No.1, pp. 6-19.
  • Gloudemans, R. (1999), Mass Appraisal of Real Property, Chicago, International Association of Assessing Officers.
  • Hensley, T. (1993), Coupling GIS with CAMA Data in Johnson County, Kansas, Property Tax Journal, Vol.12, No.1, pp. 19-36.
  • Isakson, H. (1986), The Nearest Neighbours Appraisal Technique: An Alternative to the Adjustment Grid Methods, Journal of American Real Estate & Urban Economics Association, Vol.14, No.2, pp. 274-286.
  • Leung, Y.K. & Usilappan, M. (1997), Property Tax in Singapore and Malaysia, Singapore, Butterworths Asia.
  • McCluskey, W., Deddis, W., Lamont, I. & Borst, R. (2000), The Application of Surface Generated Interpolation Models for the Prediction of Residential Property Values, Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Vol.18, No.2, pp. 162-176.
  • Morrison, D. (1990), Multivariate Statistical Methods, New York, McGraw-Hill.
  • Newsome, B. & Zietz, J. (1992), Adjusting Comparable Sales using Multiple Regression Analysis - The Need for Segmentation, The Appraisal Journal, Vol. 60, No.1, pp. 129.
  • O’Connor, P. (1982), Locational Valuation Derived Directly from the Real Estate Market with the Assistance of Response Surface Techniques, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
  • O’Connor, P. & Eichenbaum, J. (1988), Location Value Response Surfaces: The Geometry of Advanced Mass Appraisal, Property Tax Journal, Vol. 7, No.3, pp. 277-296.
  • Ramsland, M. & Markham, D. (1998), Market-supported Adjustments using Multiple Regression Analysis, The Appraisal Journal, Vol 66, No.2, pp. 181-191.
  • Paper presented at 62 IAAO Annual Conference at Houston, Texas
  • Thrall, G. (1979a), Spatial Inequities in Tax Assessment: A Case Study of Hamilton, Ontario, Economic Geography, Vol. 55, No. 2, pp. 123-134.
  • Thrall, G. (1979b), A Geographic Criterion for Identifying Property Tax Assessment Inequity, Professional Geographer, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 278-283.
  • Waller, B. (1999), The Impact of AVMs on the Appraisal Industry, The Appraisal Journal, Vol 67, No.3, pp. 287-292.
  • Ward, R. , Weaver, J. & German, J. (1999), Improving CAMA Models using Geographic Information Systems/Response Surface Analysis Location Factors, Assessment Journal, Vol. 6, No.1, pp. 30-38.
  • Watson, D. (1992), Contouring: A Guide to the Analysis and Display of Spatial Data, Oxford, Pergamon.