Evaluating the Impact of Sustainability on Investment Property Performance

Author/s: Terry Boyd

Date Published: 1/01/2006

Published in: Volume 12 - 2006 Issue 3 (pages 254 - 271)

Abstract

There is general agreement that environmental and social features, particularly those improving health and productivity of workers, will impact on the functionality of investment property. However there has been a range of opinions on whether this impact can currently be quantified through a valuation exercise (Lutzkendorf and Lorenz (2005), Sayce, Ellison and Smith (2004)). This paper examines the current literature on the assessment of the impact of environmental and social characteristics on investment property. It adds to the debate on the need for advanced techniques to assess the triple bottom line and identifies the key performance indicators that require measurement. An appropriate methodology to assess the triple bottom line result is described. The paper also incorporates a triple bottom line case study assessment in Brisbane, Australia, that demonstrates the ability of the cash flow approach to assess the worth of environmental and social characteristics. In conclusion, the paper identifies the additional data and research required to assess the worth of investment property using a triple bottom line approach.

Download Full Article

Download the Full Article PDF

14445921.2006.11104209.pdf 14445921.2006.11104209.pdf (133kB)

Keywords

Cash Flow Valuation - Contingent Valuations - Environmental Benchmarks - Simulation - Social Indicators - Triple Bottom Line

References

  • Bakens, W., Folíente, C. and Jasuja, M. (2005) Engaging stakeholders in performance-based buildings: lessons from the Performance-Based Building Network, Building Research and Information, 33(2), pp. 149-158.
  • BOMA/ULI (1999) What office tenants want, BOMA/ULI Office Tenant Survey Report, ref www.boma.org, item #159-TENANT-029.
  • Boyd, T. P. (2003) Model consistency and data specification in property DCF studies, Australian Property Journal, November, pp. 553-559.
  • Cassidy, R. (2004) Corporate real estate circa 2010, Building Design and Construction, 45:6, pp. 5.
  • Cole, R.J. (2005) Building environmental assessment methods: redefining intentions and roles, Building Research and Information, 35(5), pp. 455-467.
  • CRC Construction Innovation Project 2001-11-C, (2004) The Evaluation of the Functional Performance of Commercial Buildings, Final report, CRC-CI, Brisbane.
  • Dorfling, M. (2004) Buildings put to the greenhouse test, The Australian, 6 May. P. 40.
  • Environment Australia (2003) Triple Bottom Line Reporting in Australia - A guide to reporting against environmental indicators, June, Dept of the Environment and Heritage, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.
  • Green Building Council of Australia - Green Start Rating:website -www.gbcaus.org.info (July 2006).
  • Griffiths, J. (2003) Sustainability appraisals - should be an intrinsic part of plan-making, Planning, Issue 1540, pp. 28.
  • Humphreys, M.A. (2005) Quantifying occupant comfort: are combined indices of the indoor environment practicable? Building Research and Information, 33:4, pp. 317-325.
  • Kats, G. (2003) The Costs and Financial Benefits of Green Buildings, Report to California’s Sustainable Building Task Force, October, California.
  • Lutzkendorf, T and Lorenz, D (2005) Sustainable building investment: valuing sustainable buildings through performance assessment, Building Research and Information, 33(3), pp 212-234.
  • Ryder, T. (2003) Facing up to the future, Property Australia, Vol 18, No.4.
  • Sayce, S. and Ellison, L. (2003) Integrating sustainability into the appraisal of property worth: identifying appropriate indicators of sustainability, paper presented at the AREUEA conference, August 21-3, Skye, Scotland;
  • Sayce, S, Ellison, L. and Smith, J. (2004) Incorporating sustainability in commercial property appraisal: evidence from the UK, Australian Property Journal, August, pp. 226-233.
  • Stern, D.I. (1997) The capital theory approach to sustainability: A critical appraisal, Journal of Economic Issues, 31:1, pp. 145-174.
  • Von Paumgartten, P. (2003) The business class for high-performance green buildings: Sustainability and its financial impact, Journal of Facilities Management, 2:1, pp. 26-32.
  • Upstream (2003) Sustainability and the built environment - an agenda for action, RICS Report, June, London.