The Influence of Vintage on House Value

Author/s: Michael Rehm, Olga Filippova, Jeremy Stone

Date Published: 1/01/2006

Published in: Volume 12 - 2006 Issue 3 (pages 232 - 253)

Abstract

This research provides a significant step towards understanding the relationship between house vintage and value. This study analyses residential sales transactions in New Zealand using hedonic pricing models and uncovers evidence that a home’s vintage is a commodity that commands price premiums or discounts. Vintage is found to have a nonlinear influence on sales price and this relationship differs from market to market. In particular, wealthier markets witness a greater vintage effect, with turn-of-the-century homes realising 15% price premiums over new homes. In contrast, less wealthy markets tend to apply discounts of 20% to 40% to houses of the same vintage.

Download Full Article

Download the Full Article PDF

14445921.2006.11104208.pdf 14445921.2006.11104208.pdf (134kB)

Keywords

Hedonic Pricing Model - Heteroskedasticity - House Value - Vintage Effect

References

  • Anderson, P. F. et al. (1988) in Bennett, P. D. (ed.), Dictionary of Marketing Terms, Chicago: American Marketing Association.
  • Arnott, R., Davidson, R. and Pines, D. (1983) Housing Quality, Maintenance and Rehabilitation, The Review of Economic Studies, 50 (3), pp. 467-494.
  • Bates, D. M. and Watts, D. G. (1988) Nonlinear Regression Analysis and its Applications, New York: Wiley.
  • Chinloy, P. (1980) The Effect of Maintenance Expenditures on the Measurement of Depreciation in Housing. Journal of Urban Economics, 8, pp. 86-107.
  • Clapp, J. M. and Giaccotto, C. (1998) Residential Hedonic Models: A Rational Expectations Approach to Age Effects. Journal of Urban Economics, 44, pp. 415-437.
  • Epley, D. R. (1990) The Concept and Market Extraction of Effective Age for Residential Properties. Journal of Real Estate Research, 5 (1), pp. 41-52.
  • Do, A. Q. and Grudnitski, G. (1993) A Neural Network Analysis of the Effect of Age on Housing Values. Journal of Real Estate Research, 8 (2), pp. 253-264.
  • Fisher, I. (1906) The Nature of Capital and Income, New York: Kelly.
  • Goodman, A. C. and Thibodeau, T. G. (1995) Age-Related Heteroskedasticity in Hedonic House Price Equations. Journal of Housing Research, 6 (1), pp. 25-42.
  • Goodman, A. C. and Thibodeau, T. G. (1997) Age-Related Heteroskedasticity in Hedonic House Price Equations: An Extension. Journal of Housing Research, 8 (2), pp. 299-317.
  • Goodman, A. C. and Thibodeau, T. G. (1998) Dwelling Age Heteroskedasticity in Repeat Sales House Price Equations. Real Estate Economics, 26 (1), pp. 151-171.
  • Guasch, J. L. and Marshall, R. C. (1985) Age of Rental Housing Units and Vacancy Characteristics: A Filtering Explanation. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 15, pp. 403-419.
  • Hall, R. E. (1968) Technical Change and Capital from the Point of View of the Dual. The Review of Economic Studies, 35, pp. 35-46.
  • Hall, R. E. (1971) ‘The Measurement of Quality Change from Vintage Price Data’ in Griliches, Z. (ed.), Price Indexes and Quality Change: Studies in New Methods of Measurement, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Hayes, A. F. and Cai, L. (2006) Using Heteroscedasticity-Consistent Standard Error Estimators in OLS Regression: An Introduction and Software Implementation. Working paper, Ohio State University.
  • Knight, J. R. and Sirmans, C. F. (1996) Depreciation, Maintenance, and Housing Prices. Journal of Housing Economics, 5, pp. 369-389.
  • Long, J. S. and Ervin, L. H. (2000) Using Heteroscedasticity Consistent Standard Errors in the Linear Regression Model. The American Statistician, 54 (3), pp. 217-224.
  • Lowry, I. S. (1960) Filtering and Housing Standards, A Conceptual Analysis. Land Economics, 35, pp. 362-370.
  • Malpezzi, S., Ozanne, L. and Thibodeau, T. G. (1987) Microeconomic Estimates of Housing Depreciation. Land Economics, 63 (4), pp. 372-385.
  • Margolis, S. E. (1981) Depreciation and Maintenance of Houses. Land Economics, 57 (1), pp. 91-105.
  • Muth, R. F. (1973) A Vintage Model of the Housing Stock. Papers of the Regional Science Association, 30, pp. 141-156.
  • Randolph, W. C. (1988) Estimation of Housing Depreciation: Short-Term Quality Change and Long-Term Vintage Effects. Journal of Urban Economics, 23, pp. 162-178.
  • Rubin, G. M. (1993) Is Housing Age a Commodity? Hedonic Price Estimates of Unit Age. Journal of Housing Research, 4 (1), pp. 165-184.
  • Sabella, E. M. (1974) Determining the Relationship between a Property’s Age and its Market Value. Assessors Journal, January, pp. 81-85.
  • Sabella, E. M. (1975) The Effect of Age on Change in Property Value. Assessors Journal, April, pp. 3-6.
  • Sirmans, G. S., Macpherson, D. A. and Zietz, E. N. (2005) The Composition of Hedonic Pricing Models. Journal of Real Estate Literature, 13 (1), pp. 4-43.
  • U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (1990) American Housing Survey.Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
  • Waddell, P., Berry, B. and Chung, K. (1996) Variations in Housing Price Depreciation: The “Taste for Newness” Across Heterogeneous Submarkets. Urban Geography, 17 (3), pp. 269-280.
  • White, H. (1980) A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48 (4), pp. 817-838.