Impact of Agency Issues on Australian REIT Performance

Author/s: David Parker

Date Published: 1/01/2009

Published in: Volume 15 - 2009 Issue 2 (pages 244 - 255)

Abstract

The study seeks to investigate agency issues in the context of AREITs through consideration of price increases and price decreases relative to CEO motivation by self interest and Board independence, controlled for sector and geographic portfolio weighting. Data for price increases in the period July 2006 to December 2006 and price decreases in the period October 2007 to March 2008 for the forty largest AREITs by market capitalization on 30th May 2008 was correlated against data for sectoral and geographic portfolio composition, CEO shareholding and four proxy variables for Board independence. Only 40% of the hypothesized correlations were found to be supported, with none of the hypothesized correlations between price increase or price decrease and related party shareholdings or extent to which an AREIT may be considered a family business found to be supported.

Download Full Article

Download the Full Article PDF

14445921.2009.11104280.pdf 14445921.2009.11104280.pdf (153kB)

Keywords

Board - Control - Governance - Management - Performance - Reit

References

  • ASX Corporate Governance Council (2003) Principles of Good Corporate Governance and Best Practice Recommendations, Australian Stock Exchange, Sydney.
  • Bonn, I (2004) Board Structure and Firm Performance: Evidence From Australia, Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management, Vol 10, No 1.
  • Craswell, AT, Taylor, SL and Saywell, RA (1997) Ownership Structure and Corporate Performance: Australian Evidence, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Vol 5, No 3.
  • Fama, EF (1980) Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm, Journal of Political Economy, Vol 88.
  • Fama, EF and Jensen, MC (1983) Separation of Ownership and Control, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol 26.
  • Farrar, J (2001) Corporate Governance in Australia and New Zealand, Oxford University Press, South Melbourne.
  • Feng, Z, Ghosh, C and Sirmans, CF (2005) How Important is the Board of Directors to REIT Performance?, Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, Vol 11, No 3.
  • Friday, HS and Sirmans, GS (1998) Board of Director Monitoring and Firm Value in REITs, Journal of Real Estate Research, Vol 16, No 3.
  • Ghosh, C and Sirmans, CF (2002) Board Independence, Ownership Structure and Performance in Real Estate Investment Trusts, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Vol 26.
  • Gold, M (2006) Corporate Governance, Activism and the Role of Trustees, JASSA, Issue 2, Winter.
  • McIntosh, W, Rogers, RC, Sirmans, CF and Liang, Y (1994) Stock Price and Management Changes: The Case of REITs, Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, Vol 22, No 3.
  • Shakir, R (2008) Board Size, Executive Directors and Property Firm Performance in Malaysia, Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, Vol 14, No 1.
  • Sirmans, GS, Friday, HS and Price, RM (2006) Do Management Changes Matter? An Empirical Investigation of REIT Performance, Journal of Real Estate Research, Vol. 28.
  • UBS (2007) Real Estate Monthly Report, UBS, 2007.
  • UBS (2008) Real Estate Monthly Report, UBS, 2008.
  • Warner, JB, Watts, RL and Wruck, KH (1988) Stock Prices and Top Management Changes, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol 20.
  • Weisbach, MS (1988) Outside Directors and CEO Turnover, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol 20.
  • Weeks, HS, Griffith, JM and Howard Finch, J (2007) Risk and Performance as Determinants of REIT CEO Compensation, American Real Estate Society Conference, San Francisco.