Non-Diversifiable Risk and Quantity Discounts in Taiwanese Urban Land Markets

Author/s: Ming-Long Lee

Date Published: 1/01/2009

Published in: Volume 15 - 2009 Issue 1 (pages 122 - 139)

Abstract

Land assembly and subdivision costs are negligible in residential land markets in certain land readjustment districts of Taichung City, Taiwan. Our empirical investigation finds evidence for significant quantity discounts in the case of land sales in these post-consolidated markets. This finding contradicts the prediction of the Le Chatelier-Braun Principle put forward in the work of Lin and Evans (2000). Moreover, the discounts are larger for land sales zoned in R-2 districts than those zoned in R-1 districts. These results are consistent with Brownstone and De Vany's (1991) non-diversifiable risk hypothesis.

Download Full Article

Download the Full Article PDF

14445921.2009.11104274.pdf 14445921.2009.11104274.pdf (227kB)

Keywords

Land Price - Non-Diversifiable Risk - Parcel Size - Spatial Statistics - Taiwan

References

  • Appraisal Institute, The Appraisal of Real Estate, 12th edition. Chicago, Illinois: Appraisal Institute, 2001.
  • Atack, J. and R.A. Margo, Location, Location, Location! The Price Gradient for Vacant Urban Land: New York, 1835-1990. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 1998, 16, 151-172.
  • Brasington, D.M., House Prices and the Structure of Local Government: An Application of Spatial Statistics. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 2004 29, 211-231.
  • Brownstone, D. and A. De Vany, Zoning, Returns to Scale, and the Value of Undeveloped Land. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1991, 73, 699-704.
  • Colwell, P.F. and C.F. Simians, Area, Time, Centrality and the Value of Urban Land. Land Economics, 1978, 54, 514-519.
  • Colwell, P.F. and C.F. Sirmans, Non-Linear Urban Land Prices. Urban Geography, 1980, 1, 141-152.
  • Colwell, P.F. and C.F. Simians, A Comment on Zoning, Returns to Scale, and the Value of Undeveloped Land. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1993, 75, 783-786.
  • Colwell, P.F. and H.J. Munneke, The Structure of Urban Land Prices. Journal of Urban Economics, 1997, 41, 321-336.
  • Colwell, P.F. and H.J. Munneke, Land Prices and Land Assembly in the CBD. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 1999, 18: 163-180.
  • Department of Economic Development, 2004 Survey on Firms at Taipei Neihu Technology Park, Dawan Southern Section Industrial Park, and Nankang Software Park. Taipei City, Taiwan: Taipei City Government, 2004.
  • Department of Land Administration, Zone Expropriation Business Operation, 2009. Taipei: Department of Land Administration, Ministry of Interior
  • Ecker, M.D. and H.R. Isakson, A Unified Convex-Concave Model of Urban Land Values. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 2005, 35, 265-277.
  • Fujita, M. Urban Economic Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989. Gujarati, D.N. Essentials of Econometrics. Singapore: McGraw-Hill, 2006.
  • Guntermann, K.L. and G. Thomas, Parcel Size, Location and Commercial Land Values. Journal of Real Estate Research, 2005, 27, 343-354.
  • Hsieh, Jing-chi. Land Readjustment. Taipei: Wu-Nan Book Inc., 2007.
  • Isakson, H.R., An Empirical Analysis of the Determinants of the Value of Vacant Land. Journal of Real Estate Research, 1997, 13, 103-114.
  • Isakson, H.R. and M.D. Ecker, An Analysis of the Influence of Location in the Market for Undeveloped Urban Fringe Land. Land Economics, 2001, 66, 30-41.
  • Keefe, J.E. The Land Value Curve. Assessment Journal, 1997, 4, 31-35.
  • Lee, L.-F. Some Approaches to the Correction of Selectivity Bias. Review of Economic Studies, 1982, 49, 355-372.
  • Lee, L.-F. Notes and Comments Generalized Econometric Models with Selectivity. Econometrica, 1983 51, 507-513.
  • Lee, M.-L. and R.K. Pace, Local Housing Prices and Mortgage Refinancing in U.S. Cities. Property Management, 2006, 24, 427-441.
  • Lin, T.-C. and A.W. Evans, The Relationship Between the Price of Land and Size of Plot When Plots Are Small. Land Economics, 2000, 76, 386-394.
  • McMillen, D.P. and J.F. McDonald, Selectivity Bias in Urban Land Value Functions. Land Economics, 1989, 65, 341-351.
  • Mills, E.S., Studies in the Structure of the Urban Economy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1972.
  • Muth, R.F., Cities and Housing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969.
  • Pace, R.K., R. Barry, O.W. Gilley, and C.F. Sirmans, A Method for Spatial-Temporal Forecasting with an Application to Real Estate Prices. International Journal of Forecasting, 2000, 16, 229-246.
  • Reuter, F.H., Externalities in Urban Property Markets: An Empirical Test of the Zoning Ordinance of Pittsburgh. Journal of Law and Economics, 1973, 16, 313-349.
  • Samuelson, P.A., Foundations of Economic Analysis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1983.
  • Tabuchi, T., “Quantity Premia in Real Property Markets. Land Economics, 1996, 72: 206217.
  • Taichung City Government, Tacihung City’s Urban Land Consolidation Achievements. Taichung City, Taiwan: Taichung City Government, 2002.
  • Thorsnes, P. and D.P. McMillen, Land Value and Parcel Size: A Semiparametric analysis. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 1998, 17, 233-244.
  • Wallace, N.E., The Market Effects of Zoning Undeveloped Land: Does Zoning Follow the Market? Journal of Urban Economics, 1988, 23, 307-326.
  • Wolverton, M.L., Empirical Study of the Relationship between Residential Lot Price, Size, and View. Journal of Property Valuation and Investment, 1997, 15, 48-57.