Women Directors and Australian Reit Performance

Author/s: Bill Dimovski, Luisa Lombardi, Chris Ratcliffe, Barry J Cooper

Date Published: 1/01/2014

Published in: Volume 20 - 2014 Issue 1 (pages 3 - 11)

Abstract

This paper follows Noguera’s (2012) study on factors that might influence the return on asset (ROA) performance of REITs, including the engagement of more non-executive directors and more female directors. Using Australian data, the ROA performance of 37 Australian Real Estate Investment Trusts (A-REITs) from 2008 to 2011 is examined. As with Noguera (2012), larger A-REITs are found to tend to have higher ROA performance and A-REITs that employ more debt fare more poorly. However, the findings show that the proportion of non-executive directors and female directors are not statistically related to such performance. A Tobin’s Q measure is also used to provide a more market-based metric of A-REIT performance. The Tobin Q measure shows improved market values for A-REITs over 2010 and 2011 while those with an “office” focus tend to have performed more poorly using this measure. A pooled regression is utilised as well as fixed and random effects approaches to investigate factors influencing REIT performance. The findings suggest useful implications for A-REIT investors and boards.

Download Full Article

Download the Full Article PDF

14445921.2014.11104383.pdf 14445921.2014.11104383.pdf (359kB)

Keywords

A-Reits - Performance

References

  • Adams, RB and Ferreira, D 2009, ‘Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance’, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 94, pp. 291-309
  • Adams, RB, Hermalin, B and Weisbach, M 2010, ‘The role of boards of directors in corporate governance: a conceptual framework and survey’, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 48, pp. 58-107
  • Australian Bureau of Statistics 2012, Australian Census of Women in Leadership available at http://www.eowa.gov.au/Information_Centres/Resource_Centre/EOWA_Publications/EOWA_Census/2012_Census/CENSUS%20REPORT_Interactive.pdf (Accessed 27 November 2012)
  • Burke, RJ 1997, ‘Women directors: selection, acceptance and benefits of board membership’, Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 5, pp. 118-125
  • Burke, RJ 2003, ‘Women on corporate boards of directors: the timing is right’, Women in Management Review, Vol. 18, pp. 346-8
  • Carter, DA, Simpkins, BJ and Simpson, WG 2003, ‘Corporate governance, board diversity and firm value’, The Financial Review, Vol. 38, pp. 33-53
  • Catalyst 2012, Women on boards, Catalyst, New York, NY.
  • Dimovski, W, Lombardi, L and Cooper, B 2013, ‘Women directors on boards of Australian real estate investment trusts’, Journal of Property Investment and Finance, Vol. 31, pp. 196-207
  • Dimovski, W 2009, ‘The global financial crisis and the Centro Properties Group earnings revision and refinancing announcements: an event study’, Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, Vol. 15, pp. 417-429
  • European Public Real Estate Association (EPRA) 2012, Global REIT survey 2012, September 2012, EPRA.
  • Farrell, KA and Hersch, PL 2005, ‘Additions to corporate boards: the effect of gender’, Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 11, pp.85-106
  • Ghosh, C and Sirmans, C 2003, ‘Board independence, ownership structure and performance: evidence from real estate investment trusts’, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Vol. 26, pp. 287-318
  • Gul, FA, Srinidhi, B and Ng, AC 2011, ‘Does board gender diversity improve the informativeness of stock prices?’, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 51, pp. 314-338
  • Hermalin, B and Weisbach, M 2003, ‘Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: a survey of the economic literature’, FRBNY Economic Policy Review, pp. 7-26.
  • Hyland, MM and Marcellino, PA 2002, ‘Examining gender on corporate boards: a regional study’, Corporate Governance, Vol. 2, pp. 24-31
  • Lehn, K, Patro, S and Zhao, M 2009, ‘Determinants of the size and composition of US corporate boards: 1935-2000’, Financial Management, Vol. 38, pp. 747-780
  • Mateos de Cabo, R, Gimeno, R and Nieto, MJ 2012, ‘Gender diversity on European banks’ board of directors’, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 109, pp. 145-162
  • Mehran, H 1995, ‘Executive compensation structure, ownership and firm performance’, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 38, pp. 163-184
  • Newell, G 2007, ‘The significance of property in industry-based superannuation funds’, Australian and New Zealand Property Journal, Vol. 1, pp. 34-43
  • Noguera, M 2012, ‘The impact of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act on the structure of REIT boards of directors’, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Vol. 45, pp. 869-887
  • Parker, DRR 2009, Impact of board composition on Australian REIT performance, 15 Pacific-Rim Real Estate Society Conference, 18-21 January 2009, Sydney
  • Property Investment Research 2011, Property Funds Manager Survey 2011. PIR, Melbourne
  • Sheridan, A 2002, ‘What you know and who you know: “successful” women’s experiences of accessing board positions’ , Career Development International, Vol. 7, pp. 203-210
  • Singh, V, Vinnicombe, S and Johnson, P 2001, ‘Women directors on top UK boards’, Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 9, pp. 206-216
  • Singh, V and Vinnicombe, S 2003, ‘The 2002 female FTSE index and women directors’, Women in Management Review, Vol. 18, pp. 349-358
  • Singh, V and Vinnicombe, S 2004, ‘Why so few women directors in top UK boardrooms?: evidence and theoretical explanations’, Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 12, pp. 479-488
  • Terjesen, S, Sealy, R and Singh, V 2009, ‘Women directors on corporate boards: a review and research agenda’ , Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 17, pp. 320-337